@inproceedings{FunkBaechlerBaechleretal.2015,
  author    = {Markus Funk and Andreas B{\"a}chler and Liane B{\"a}chler and Oliver Korn and Christoph Krieger and Thomas Heidenreich and Albrecht Schmidt},
  title     = {Comparing projected in-situ feedback at the manual assembly workplace with impaired workers},
  series = {PETRA '15: Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments},
  address   = {New York},
  organization    = {Association for Computing Machinery},
  isbn      = {978-1-4503-3452-5},
  doi       = {10.1145/2769493.2769496},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {With projectors and depth cameras getting cheaper, assistive systems in industrial manufacturing are becoming increasingly ubiquitous. As these systems are able to continuously provide feedback using in-situ projection, they are perfectly suited for supporting impaired workers in assembling products. However, so far little research has been conducted to understand the effects of projected instructions on impaired workers. In this paper, we identify common visualizations used by assistive systems for impaired workers and introduce a simple contour visualization. Through a user study with 64 impaired participants we compare the different visualizations to a control group using no visual feedback in a real world assembly scenario, i.e. assembling a clamp. Furthermore, we introduce a simplified version of the NASA-TLX questionnaire designed for impaired participants. The results reveal that the contour visualization is significantly better in perceived mental load and perceived performance of the participants. Further, participants made fewer errors and were able to assemble the clamp faster using the contour visualization compared to a video visualization, a pictorial visualization and a control group using no visual feedback.},
  language  = {en}
}