@inproceedings{YusoffZakariaSikoraetal.2020,
  author    = {Nin Hayati Mohd Yusoff and Nurul Azma Zakaria and Axel Sikora and Jubin Sebastian Elayanithottathil},
  title     = {HRPL Protocol for 6LoWPAN Smart Home System: A Performance Assessment Analysis},
  series = {IEEE IDAACS-SWS 2020 : 5th IEEE International Symposium on Smart and Wireless Systems within the International Conferences on Intelligent Data Acquisition and Advanced Computing Systems : Conference Proceedings},
  publisher = {IEEE},
  isbn      = {978-1-7281-9960-3 (digital)},
  doi       = {10.1109/IDAACS-SWS50031.2020.9297079},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {The development of Internet of Things (IoT) embedded devices is proliferating, especially in the smart home automation system. However, the devices unfortunately are imposing overhead on the IoT network. Thus, the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) have introduced the IPv6 Low-Power Wireless Personal Area Network (6LoWPAN) to provide a solution to this constraint. 6LoWPAN is an Internet Protocol (IP) based communication where it allows each device to connect to the Internet directly. As a result, the power consumption is reduced. However, the limitation of data transmission frame size of the IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-power and Lossy Network’s (RPL’s) had made it to be the running overhead, and thus consequently degrades the performance of the network in terms of Quality of Service (QoS), especially in a large network. Therefore, HRPL was developed to enhance the RPL protocol to minimize redundant retransmission that causes the routing overhead. We introduced the T-Cut Off Delay to set the limit of the delay and the H field to respond to actions taken within the T-Cut Off Delay. Thus, this paper presents the comparison performance assessment of HRPL between simulation and real-world scenarios (6LoWPAN Smart Home System (6LoSH) testbed) in validating the HRPL functionalities. Our results show that HRPL had successfully reduced the routing overhead when implemented in 6LoSH. The observed Control Traffic Overhead (CTO) packet difference between each experiment is 7.1\%, and the convergence time is 9.3\%. Further research is recommended to be conducted for these metrics: latency, Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR), and throughput.},
  language  = {en}
}