@inproceedings{HeinkeIsmerKuehnertetal.2011, author = {Matthias Heinke and Bruno Ismer and Helmut K{\"u}hnert and Tobias Heinke and Ralf Surber and Friedhelm K{\"u}the and Anna Haltenberger and Martin Lorenz and Daniela Eisentr{\"a}ger and Dirk Prochnau and Hans Reiner Figulla}, title = {Usability of transesophageal electrical intra-left ventricular and inter-ventricular conduction delay to improve patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy}, series = {Biomedical Engineering / Biomedizinische Technik}, volume = {56}, publisher = {Walter de Gruyter}, address = {Berlin, Boston}, issn = {0013-5585 (Print)}, doi = {10.1515/bmt.2011.845}, pages = {13 -- 14}, year = {2011}, abstract = {Introduction: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing (BV) is an established therapy for heart failure (HF) patients (P) with ventricular desynchronisation, but not all patients improved clinically. Aim of this study was to evaluate electrical intra-left ventricular conduction delay (LVCD) and interventricular conduction delay (IVCD), to better select patients for CRT. Methods: 65 HF patients (age 63.4 ± 10.6 years; 7 females, 58 males) with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class 3 ± 0.2, 24.4 ± 6.7 \% left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction and 167.4 ± 35.6 ms QRSD were included. Esophageal TO Osypka focused hemispherical electrodes catheter was perorally applied in position of maximum LV deflection to measure LVCD between onset and offset of LV deflection and IVCD between earliest onset of QRS in the 12-channel surface ECG and onset of LV deflection in the focused bipolar transesophageal LV electrogram. Results: There were 50 responders with LVCD of 76.5 ± 20.4 ms, IVCD of 80.5 ± 26.1 ms (P=0.34) and QRSD of 171 ± 37.7 ms. 15 non-responders had longer LVCD of 90 ± 28.5 ms (P = 0.045), shorter IVCD of 50.1 ± 29.1 ms (P < 0.001) and QRSD of 155.3 ± 25 ms (P=0.14). During 21.3 ± 20.3 month BV pacing follow-up, the responder`s NYHA classes improved from 3 ± 0.2 to 2. ± 0.3 (P < 0.001) whereas the non-responders NYHA classes did not improve from 3 ± 0.2 to 2.9 ± 0.3 (P = 0.43) during 15.7 ± 13.9 month BV pacing follow-up (53 Boston, 10 Medtronic and 2 St. Jude CRT devices). Conclusion: Determination of electrical LVCD and IVCD by focused bipolar transesophageal LV electrogram recording may be an additional useful technique to improve patient selection for CRT.}, language = {en} }