Volltext-Downloads (blau) und Frontdoor-Views (grau)

Flexibility Management Approaches for LV Grids: Comparing §14a EnWG, Dynamic Operating Envelopes, and Grid-Sensitive Energy Communities

  • The increasing integration of distributed energy resources such as photovoltaic systems, electric vehicles, battery energy storage systems and heat pumps into low-voltage (LV) distribution grids presents significant technical and regulatory challenges. This paper compares three prominent flexibility management approaches with respect to their suitability for managing grid congestion, enhancingThe increasing integration of distributed energy resources such as photovoltaic systems, electric vehicles, battery energy storage systems and heat pumps into low-voltage (LV) distribution grids presents significant technical and regulatory challenges. This paper compares three prominent flexibility management approaches with respect to their suitability for managing grid congestion, enhancing grid stability, and enabling the energy transition in Germany: (1) §14a of the German Energy Industry Act (EnWG), (2) Dynamic Operating Envelopes (DOEs), and (3) Grid-Sensitive Energy Communities (GrECs). Through a detailed review of technical implementations, regulatory frameworks, and prosumer participation levels, we identify the strengths and limitations of each method. §14a EnWG offers a reactive and centralized curative measure suited to immediate congestion relief. DOEs provide a proactive, market-integrated mechanism leveraging real-time grid conditions to dynamically allocate import and export limits. GrECs exhibit a broader range of methods and approaches due to the absence of a unified definition. They typically employ proactive mechanisms that generate individual schedules for community members to prevent grid congestion. Their acceptance among prosumers is higher, as side constraints can incorporate economic objectives. DOEs and GrECs face similar challenges, particularly the lack of regulatory adaptation and the requirement for advanced digital infrastructure. The paper concludes that §14a EnWG provides immediate grid relief and its scalability is limited; while DOEs and GrECs offer adaptability and market benefits but demand regulatory and infrastructure advances, whereas GrECs also involve higher implementation and communication challenges.…zeige mehrzeige weniger

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Suche bei Google Scholar

Statistik

frontdoor_oas
Metadaten
Dokumentart:Konferenzveröffentlichung
Review-Status:Begutachtet (reviewed)
Art der Konferenzveröffentlichung:Konferenzartikel
Zitierlink: https://opus.hs-offenburg.de/11815
Bibliografische Angaben
Titel (Englisch):Flexibility Management Approaches for LV Grids: Comparing §14a EnWG, Dynamic Operating Envelopes, and Grid-Sensitive Energy Communities
Konferenzangaben:International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Applications (14. : 2025 : Vienna, Austria)
Verfasserangaben:Evi Monique KasperStaff MemberORCiD, Sylvia WüstStaff MemberORCiD, Michael SchmidtStaff MemberORCiDGND
Erscheinungsjahr:2025
Verlag:IEEE
Seitenanzahl:8
Erste Seite:1575
Letzte Seite:1582
Titel des übergeordneten Werkes (Englisch):14th International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Applications (ICRERA 2025)
ISBN:979-8-3315-9989-8 (Elektronisch)
ISBN:979-8-3315-9990-4 (Print on Demand)
ISSN:2572-6013 (Elektronisch)
ISSN:2377-6897 (Print on Demand)
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRERA66237.2025.11283972
Sprache:Englisch
Inhaltliche Informationen
Fakultäten / Einrichtungen:Fakultät Elektrotechnik, Medizintechnik und Informatik (EMI) (ab 04/2019)
Forschung:INES - Institut für nachhaltige Energiesysteme
Sammlungen der Hochschule Offenburg:Bibliografie
Freies Schlagwort / Tag:DOE; Dynamic Operating Envelopes; Flexibility Management in Low-Voltage Distribution Grids; GrEC; Grid-Sensitive Energy Communities; §14a EnWG
Gefördert durch (Freitext):All authors acknowledge funding from the GrECCo project, which was funded by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy under grant number 03EI4057C. Furthermore, the authors acknowledge funding from the ASIMUTE project (Intelligent Self-Consumption and Storage for Better Energy Utilization), cofunded by the European Union under the Interreg Oberrhein program (reference number 20416).
Speicherung von Forschungsdaten:OPUS-HSO
Formale Angaben
Relevanz für "Jahresbericht über Forschungsleistungen":1-fach | Konferenzbeitrag
Open-Access-Status: Closed 
Lizenz (Deutsch):License LogoUrheberrechtlich geschützt