Open Access

Kevin Bill, Julia Bartsch, Steffen Willwacher, Ola Eriksrud, Lasse Mausehund, Uwe Gustav Kersting, Tron Krosshaug, Patrick Mai

• OBJECTIVE: To compare knee abduction moment (KAM) magnitudes between a generic 180° pivot turn (modified 505 change-of-direction test; m505) and a handball-specific sidestep cut, and to assess ranking consistency. Additionally, to examine the resultant ground reaction force (GRF) and its frontal plane moment arm to the knee to comprehend their contributions to KAM. STUDY DESIGN: ObservationalOBJECTIVE: To compare knee abduction moment (KAM) magnitudes between a generic 180° pivot turn (modified 505 change-of-direction test; m505) and a handball-specific sidestep cut, and to assess ranking consistency. Additionally, to examine the resultant ground reaction force (GRF) and its frontal plane moment arm to the knee to comprehend their contributions to KAM. STUDY DESIGN: Observational laboratory study. METHODS: High-level female handball players (n = 45) performed the m505 and handball-specific sidestep cut. Resultant GRF, its frontal plane moment arm to the knee, and KAM were obtained and subsequently compared between the tasks. Rank correlation coefficients were employed to assess if variables of both tasks are related. RESULTS: Peak KAM was similar for the m505 and the sidestep cut (1.79 (0.95 – 3.53) Nm/kg vs. 1.64 (0.34 – 3.60) Nm/kg; rB = .25; p = .14). The ranking of the players' peak KAM differed substantially (rS = 0.26, p = .084), suggesting that different tasks could classify the same player with different injury risk. The m505 generated lower resultant GRF (24 ± 4 N/kg, 95% CI [23, 24] vs. 33 ± 9 N/kg, 95% CI [31, 35]; d = 1.30; p < .001) but longer frontal plane moment arms (7.8 ± 1.8 cm, 95% CI [7.3, 8.4] vs. 5.4 ± 1.5 cm, 95% CI: [5.0, 5.8]; d = 1.36; p < .001) than the sidestep cut. CONCLUSION: A difference in individual ACL injury risk assessment depending on movement type was revealed. While KAM magnitudes were similar across direction-change tasks, player rankings differed. The contributions of resultant GRF and frontal plane moment arms to peak KAM varied between tasks, underscoring the importance of task-specific and individualized injury prevention.…