Refine
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (1)
- Master's Thesis (1)
Conference Type
- Konferenzartikel (1)
Language
- English (2)
Keywords
- fingerprinting (2) (remove)
Institute
Open Access
- Closed Access (2) (remove)
Physically Unclonable Functions (PUFs) are hardware-based security primitives, which allow for inherent device fingerprinting. Therefore, intrinsic variation of imperfect manufactured systems is exploited to generate device-specific, unique identifiers. With printed electronics (PE) joining the internet of things (IoT), hardware-based security for novel PE-based systems is of increasing importance. Furthermore, PE offers the possibility for split-manufacturing, which mitigates the risk of PUF response readout by third parties, before commissioning. In this paper, we investigate a printed PUF core as intrinsic variation source for the generation of unique identifiers from a crossbar architecture. The printed crossbar PUF is verified by simulation of a 8×8-cells crossbar, which can be utilized to generate 32-bit wide identifiers. Further focus is on limiting factors regarding printed devices, such as increased parasitics, due to novel materials and required control logic specifications. The simulation results highlight, that the printed crossbar PUF is capable to generate close-to-ideal unique identifiers at the investigated feature size. As proof of concept a 2×2-cells printed crossbar PUF core is fabricated and electrically characterized.
Much of the research in the field of audio-based machine learning has focused on recreating human speech via feature extraction and imitation, known as deepfakes. The current state of affairs has prompted a look into other areas, such as the recognition of recording devices, and potentially speakers, by only analysing sound files. Segregation and feature extraction are at the core of this approach.
This research focuses on determining whether a recorded sound can reveal the recording device with which it was captured. Each specific microphone manufacturer and model, among other characteristics and imperfections, can have subtle but compounding effects on the results, whether it be differences in noise, or the recording tempo and sensitivity of the microphone while recording. By studying these slight perturbations, it was found to be possible to distinguish between microphones based on the sounds they recorded.
After the recording, pre-processing, and feature extraction phases we completed, the prepared data was fed into several different machine learning algorithms, with results ranging from 70% to 100% accuracy, showing Multi-Layer Perceptron and Logistic Regression to be the most effective for this type of task.
This was further extended to be able to tell the difference between two microphones of the same make and model. Achieving the identification of identical models of a microphone suggests that the small deviations in their manufacturing process are enough of a factor to uniquely distinguish them and potentially target individuals using them. This however does not take into account any form of compression applied to the sound files, as that may alter or degrade some or most of the distinguishing features that are necessary for this experiment.
Building on top of prior research in the area, such as by Das et al. in in which different acoustic features were explored and assessed on their ability to be used to uniquely fingerprint smartphones, more concrete results along with the methodology by which they were achieved are published in this project’s publicly accessible code repository.