Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (reviewed) (13)
- Article (unreviewed) (13)
- Study Thesis (13)
- Working Paper (13)
- Part of a Book (5)
- Book (2)
Keywords
- Export (24)
- COVID-19 (17)
- Government Measures (13)
- Trade (10)
- Corona (9)
- Crisis (8)
- Finance (7)
- ECA (5)
- Innovation (3)
- Insurance (3)
Institute
- IfTI - Institute for Trade and Innovation (59) (remove)
Open Access
- Open Access (39)
- Closed (8)
- Closed Access (5)
- Bronze (2)
- Diamond (2)
- Gold (1)
- Hybrid (1)
This paper aims to draw attention to an urgent need for reform of the regulatory framework of the broader export credit system to ensure a new and comprehensive "safe haven" for officially supported export credits. The purpose is to analyse the complex debate on disciplines of the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), creating a point of reference for future analysis of and debates around the "carve-out clause" of the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (ASCM) and a "safe haven" in a broader sense.
Export sichert Millionen von Arbeitsplätzen in Deutschland. Auch in anderen Ländern profitieren Menschen von positiven Effekten durch internationale Aktivitäten von Unternehmen. Finanzierung und Risikoabsicherung durch staatliche Exportkreditagenturen spielen dabei eine wesentliche Rolle, wenn der Markt versagt. Dies gilt gerade in Krisenzeiten wie der Covid-19-Pandemie. Regierungen haben mit Coronahilfen für die Exportwirtschaft Außenhandel ermöglicht und dadurch zahlreiche Arbeitsplätze gesichert. Mit einer Vielzahl von Aktivitäten haben unter anderem Dänemark, Deutschland, Polen und Österreich im Jahr 2020 schnell und effizient agiert. Teilweise deutlich erhöhte Finanzmittel, neue Garantieprodukte, verbesserte Finanzierungs- und Versicherungsbedingungen sowie vereinfachte Antragsverfahren waren zentrale Maßnahmen europäischer Regierungen. Gezeigt hat sich, dass auch in der Zukunft eine übergeordnete strategische Ausrichtung, ein gemeinsamer Förderansatz sowie eine wirkungsorientierte Gestaltung von Förderinstitutionen wichtig sind.
Entwicklung und globale Diffusion von zukunftsorientierten Technologien sind zentrale Faktoren für den ökonomischen Erfolg von Volkswirtschaften. Die Digitalisierung der Unternehmen spielt inzwischen eine entscheidende Rolle für das Wirtschaftswachstum eines Landes. Wissensintensive Wirtschaftsbereiche wachsen rasant, und internationale Arbeitsteilung über globale Wertschöpfungsketten sowie ausländische Direktinvestitionen prägen den Alltag vieler Firmen.
Innovative financing schemes in public management comprise provisions of funds for public expenditure by taxation, user charges, borrowing or other fundraising in a novel way. Scholarly research regarding public finance already appeared in the 16th century, but the role of public funding schemes became much more important in the last decades. Theoretical frameworks are related to political, economic, legal and administrative aspects. Although innovation and public management might be seen as antithetical, there is an emerging practice of innovative financing tools both in highly-industrialised economies and developing countries. Examples for novel mechanisms raising money are green bonds, onshore local currency financing, public private partnerships (PPPs) and resource-financed infrastructure. Public policy tools include innovation financing for digital infrastructure or export credits for trade-driven innovation, often focusing on the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) including climate action.
The aim of the essay is to identify current trends in infrastructure financing in times of net zero, crucial challenges, and solutions to overcome these issues. To gain information, a fundamental literal research, and interviews with infrastructure financing specialists of development banks were conducted. The growing importance of climate aspects for financing decisions, the changing sources of infrastructure funding and the increased role of Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs) can be listed as the most important trends. The main challenges are the financing gap for infrastructure, the high investment risks and a lack of standards, and policies regarding climate neutrality. To overcome these challenges, innovative financing solutions and the merging of public and private funding have been identified as potential solutions.
This paper examines and evaluates the challenges and opportunities of export credit agencies (ECA) in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. Political risks, unrest and instability made exports in the MENA region arduous. Further challenges are demonetization, the lack of reliable information and the acquisition of skilled employees. Access to financial resources can be quite challenging and several ECAs in the MENA region struggle from having no economies of scale. The global trend of globalisation and digitalisation has proved to be both a challenge and an opportunity. Nevertheless, the ECAs are becoming progressively important and needed in the MENA region. ECAs can benefit from this by working closely with financial institutions, banks and stakeholders. Other opportunities are infrastructure, renewable energies, international events and the diversification of the product portfolio. Through research on the ECAs EGE, ECI, Credit Oman and ICIEC, differences of multilateral and national export credit agencies have been analysed as well.
The aim of this essay is to point out the challenges and opportunities of government export credits and insurance in Europe. The Covid-19 pandemic confronted the entire world with new challenges. This also applied to the export financing and insurance market. Furthermore, there are also challenges that play a major role for ECAs regardless of the pandemic. However, the risks are also offset by opportunities that may enable European export credit agencies to prevail against international competition.
The focus of this essay is on the export credit agencies from Finland (Finnvera), Sweden (EKN) and Portugal (COSEC). As part of the European Union (EU) and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) the three ECAs share many fundamental similarities but in some points they may also distinguish from each other.
The aim of this essay is to give an overview about recent developments of the government innovation funds of Sweden and Finland. In order to discover recent developments basic knowledge regarding innovation funds, funding structures and information about the two big funding agencies Vinnova Sweden and Business Finland is presented. Building on this information, the developments of the two funding agencies are compared and examined for similarities and differences. Both countries have a very similar structure in terms of the R&D sector and are striving with the same issues. Just as sustainability is a leading issue, the collaboration between the different shareholders is another main challenge. Both topics were negatively affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Both Sweden and Finland had to really push forward innovation with financial support and political, strategic goals. Even though there are strong recent developments, the countries are facing the same challenges, do have similar funding structures and therefore have no big comparative strengths or weaknesses to each other.
Innovation Policies and Government Instruments – An illustration of Israel’s innovation system
(2021)
The aim of this paper is to introduce innovation policy measures, government instruments and conceptual approaches to promote innovation growth. Since Israel is increasingly establishing itself as a pioneer for innovation, this paper mainly refers to their innovation policy. This paper will explain why Israel's innovation policy is successful and which actors play a particularly important role in it. Using semi-structured interviews, government experts like the Israel Innovation Authority as well as companies like Bosch were asked about Israel’s national innovation system and its success which allowed diverse perspectives on the topic.
The aim of this essay is to give a systematic review of the literature. Climate change is omnipresent and manifests itself in a steady increase in global warming. This trend was triggered as a reaction to increasing emissions in the course of industrialization. Climate finance is generally understood to be the provision of public, private, and alternative sources of finance that represent measures to mitigate and adapt to climate change. Significant commitments to support developing countries by developed countries have been manifested in the UNFCC climate framework and the Paris Climate Agreement. Funding from public and private sources increased to a total of $540 billion in 2019. Whether multilateral or bilateral, the largest share is provided in the form of loans to the target countries.