300 Sozialwissenschaften
Refine
Document Type
- Article (unreviewed) (4) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- no (4)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (4)
Keywords
- Export (2)
- ECA (1)
- Export Credit (1)
- Innovationsfinanzierung (1)
- Public Service Models (1)
Institute
Open Access
- Bronze (1)
- Closed (1)
- Closed Access (1)
- Open Access (1)
Risk aversion, financing and real servicThe Global CEO Survey was launched in 2015 by researchers from Offenburg University, the University of Westminster and the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) to better understand and discover what factors influence exporters’ demand for credit insurance. Although some scholars discussed aspects of corporate insurance demand with regard to exporters, there is limited research concerning the demand for export credit insurance associated with firm-specific factors. Only few empirical studies support existing theories on corporate insurance demand and export credits. This project investigates and fills the relevant gap of official export credit insurance demand.es
In an extensive research project, we have assessed the application of different service models by export credit agencies (ECAs) and export-import banks (EXIMs). We conducted interviews with 35 representatives of ECAs and EXIMs from 27 countries. The question guiding this study is: How do ECAs and EXIMs adopt public service models for supporting exporters? We conducted a holistic multiple case study, investigating if and how these organisations apply public service models developed by Schedler and Guenduez, and which roles of the state are relevant. We find that there is a variety of different service models used by ECAs and EXIMs, and that the service model approaches have great potential to learn from each other and innovate existing services.
Staatliche Exportkreditagenturen und Export-Import-Banken finanzieren, versichern und garantieren jährlich fast 1 Bio. US-Dollar – mehr als 3 % der globalen Güterexporte. Ihre Interventionen sind an internationale Rahmenbedingungen gebunden, insbesondere an das WTO-Subventionsübereinkommen (ASCM) und den OECD-Konsensus. Das komplexe Zusammenspiel beider Rechtsrahmen sorgt seit langem für Herausforderungen, vor allem hinsichtlich des Anwendungsbereichs des “safe haven” des ASCM und des “Matching”-Mechanismus der OECD. In den vergangenen Jahren hinzugekommen ist die Problematik neuer Instrumente der Exportvor- sowie der Klimafinanzierung. Der folgende Beitrag erörtert Herausforderungen und Lösungsansätze. Er zeigt auf, dass der neue OECD-Konsensus trotz zahlreicher Verbesserungen zentrale rechtliche Probleme nicht behebt.