Refine
Year of publication
- 2022 (106) (remove)
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (106) (remove)
Conference Type
- Konferenzartikel (87)
- Konferenz-Abstract (13)
- Konferenz-Poster (3)
- Sonstiges (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (106)
Keywords
- injury (10)
- Machine Learning (5)
- biomechanics (5)
- running (5)
- ACL (4)
- Robustness (4)
- Radar (3)
- RoboCup (3)
- sport (3)
- 3D printing (2)
Institute
- Fakultät Elektrotechnik, Medizintechnik und Informatik (EMI) (ab 04/2019) (42)
- Fakultät Maschinenbau und Verfahrenstechnik (M+V) (31)
- Fakultät Wirtschaft (W) (22)
- Fakultät Medien (M) (ab 22.04.2021) (13)
- INES - Institut für nachhaltige Energiesysteme (13)
- ivESK - Institut für verlässliche Embedded Systems und Kommunikationselektronik (11)
- IMLA - Institute for Machine Learning and Analytics (10)
- ACI - Affective and Cognitive Institute (3)
- IUAS - Institute for Unmanned Aerial Systems (3)
- POIM - Peter Osypka Institute of Medical Engineering (2)
Open Access
- Open Access (52)
- Closed (45)
- Bronze (29)
- Diamond (13)
- Closed Access (9)
- Grün (6)
- Hybrid (2)
- Gold (1)
Generative machine learning models for creative purposes play an increasingly prominent role in the field of dance and technology. A particularly popular approach is the use of such models for generating synthetic motions. Such motions can either serve as source of ideation for choreographers or control an artificial dancer that acts as improvisation partner for human dancers. Several examples employ autoencoder-based deep-learning architectures that have been trained on motion capture recordings of human dancers. Synthetic motions are then generated by navigating the autoencoder's latent space. This paper proposes an alternative approach of using an autoencoder for creating synthetic motions. This approach controls the generation of synthetic motions on the level of the motion itself rather than its encoding. Two different methods are presented that follow this principle. Both methods are based on the interactive control of a single joint of an artificial dancer while the other joints remain under the control of the autoencoder. The first method combines the control of the orientation of a joint with iterative autoencoding. The second method combines the control of the target position of a joint with forward kinematics and the application of latent difference vectors. As illustrative example of an artistic application, this latter method is used for an artificial dancer that plays a digital instrument. The paper presents the implementation of these two methods and provides some preliminary results.