Refine
Year of publication
- 2016 (48) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (reviewed) (15)
- Conference Proceeding (15)
- Part of a Book (5)
- Patent (5)
- Article (unreviewed) (3)
- Report (3)
- Book (2)
Conference Type
- Konferenzartikel (11)
- Konferenz-Abstract (2)
- Konferenz-Poster (1)
- Sonstiges (1)
Has Fulltext
- no (48) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (48) (remove)
Keywords
- Dünnschichtchromatographie (3)
- Energieversorgung (3)
- Haustechnik (3)
- Methanisierung (3)
- Analyse (2)
- Energie (2)
- Erneuerbare Energien (2)
- Feuchtigkeit (2)
- Teststreifen (2)
- Umweltforschung (2)
Institute
- Fakultät Maschinenbau und Verfahrenstechnik (M+V) (48) (remove)
Open Access
- Closed Access (15)
- Open Access (15)
- Bronze (3)
- Closed (3)
Der vorliegende Beitrag beschreibt erste Untersuchungsergebnisse an Wellenabsätzen mit im Kerbgrund überlagerter Schrägbohrung, mit Hilfe der Finite-Elemente-Methode (FEM). Als Beispiel hierfür können Walzen mit Heizkanälen in Walzwerken, Turbinen- und Kurbelwellen genannt werden. Es ist nicht bekannt, welche Spannungserhöhung die Schrägbohrung im Wellenabsatz hervorruft. In den Normen oder Richtlinien sind keine Angaben über Formzahlen für diese Kerbkombination vorhanden. Deshalb werden die Formzahlen für unterschiedliche schräggebohrte Wellenabsätze je Belastungsart ermittelt, ausgewertet und entsprechende Formzahldiagramme und Gestaltungshinweise angegeben.
Passive solar elements for both direct and indirect gains, are systems used to maintain a comfortable living environment while saving energy, especially in the building energy retrofit and adaptation process. Sunspaces, thermal mass and glazing area and orientation have been often used in the past to guarantee adequate indoor conditions when mechanical devices were not available. After a period of neglect, nowadays they are again considered as appropriate systems to help face environmental issues in the building sector, and both international and national legislation takes into consideration the possibility of including them in the building planning tools, also providing economic incentives. Their proper design needs dynamic simulation, often difficult to perform and time consuming. Moreover, results generally suffer from several uncertainties, so quasi steady-state procedures are often used in everyday practice with good results, but some corrections are still needed. In this paper, a comparative analysis of different solutions for the construction of verandas in an existing building is presented, following the procedure provided by the slightly modified and improved Standard EN ISO 13790:2008. Advantages and disadvantages of different configurations considering thermal insulation, windows typology and mechanical ventilation systems are discussed and a general intervention strategy is proposed. The aim is to highlight the possibility of using sunspaces in order to increase the efficiency of the existing building stock, considering ease of construction and economic viability.
Energy Performance of Verandas in the Building Retrofit Process (PDF Download Available). Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303093420_Energy_Performance_of_Verandas_in_the_Building_Retrofit_Process [accessed Jul 5, 2017].
This paper presents the results of the idea generation experiment that repeats the study originally conducted at RMIT. In order to establish the influence that the experimental treatments make on the number and the breadth of solution ideas proposed by problem solvers with different knowledge levels, students from different years of study were recruited. Ninety students from the Offenburg University of Applied Sciences, Germany were divided into three groups. All students were asked to generate ideas on cleaning lime deposits from the inside of a water pipe and were given 16 minutes to record their individual ideas. Students of two experimental groups were shown some words for two minuted each. The Su-Field group was exposed to the eight fields of MATCEMIB. The Random Word group was shown eight random words every two minutes. The Su-Field group outperformed both the Control group and the Random Word group in the number of ideas generated. It was also found that the students from the Su-Field group proposed significantly broader solutions than the students from the Control and Random Word groups. The overall results of the experiment support the conclusions made by the RMIT researchers that simple ideation techniques can significantly improve idea generation and that the systematised Substance-Field Analysis is a suitable heuristic for engineering students.