Refine
Year of publication
- 2023 (2)
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (2) (remove)
Conference Type
- Konferenzartikel (2)
Language
- English (2)
Has Fulltext
- no (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (2)
Keywords
- Deep Leaning (2)
Institute
- IMLA - Institute for Machine Learning and Analytics (2) (remove)
Open Access
- GrĂ¼n (2) (remove)
Neural networks have a number of shortcomings. Amongst the severest ones is the sensitivity to distribution shifts which allows models to be easily fooled into wrong predictions by small perturbations to inputs that are often imperceivable to humans and do not have to carry semantic meaning. Adversarial training poses a partial solution to address this issue by training models on worst-case perturbations. Yet, recent work has also pointed out that the reasoning in neural networks is different from humans. Humans identify objects by shape, while neural nets mainly employ texture cues. Exemplarily, a model trained on photographs will likely fail to generalize to datasets containing sketches. Interestingly, it was also shown that adversarial training seems to favorably increase the shift toward shape bias. In this work, we revisit this observation and provide an extensive analysis of this effect on various architectures, the common L_2-and L_-training, and Transformer-based models. Further, we provide a possible explanation for this phenomenon from a frequency perspective.
It is common practice to apply padding prior to convolution operations to preserve the resolution of feature-maps in Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN). While many alternatives exist, this is often achieved by adding a border of zeros around the inputs. In this work, we show that adversarial attacks often result in perturbation anomalies at the image boundaries, which are the areas where padding is used. Consequently, we aim to provide an analysis of the interplay between padding and adversarial attacks and seek an answer to the question of how different padding modes (or their absence) affect adversarial robustness in various scenarios.