Refine
Document Type
- Article (reviewed) (4) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (4) (remove)
Keywords
- Mathematik (4) (remove)
Institute
Open Access
- Open Access (2)
- Closed Access (1)
Für viele Studierende sind Vorkurse der erste Kontakt zu Hochschullehre und Mitstudierenden. Wie kann der fachliche Einstieg in einem digitalen Lehrformat trotz fehlender Präsenz gelingen und persönliche Unterstützung, ein erstes Kennenlernen und soziale Eingebundenheit gefördert werden? Diesem Erkenntnisinteresse folgend stellt der folgende Beitrag ein digitales Brückenkursformat mit Elementen zur Interaktion, Kommunikation und Kollaboration vor, das mit ca. 400 Studierenden in zehn Kursen mit acht Lehrbeauftragten umgesetzt und entlang der o.g. Frage evaluiert wurde. Um den Transfer auf andere Lehrveranstaltungen zu erleichtern, wurde das Konzept in ein didaktisches Entwurfsmuster übertragen.
This paper presents the results of the idea generation experiment that repeats the study originally conducted at RMIT. In order to establish the influence that the experimental treatments make on the number and the breadth of solution ideas proposed by problem solvers with different knowledge levels, students from different years of study were recruited. Ninety students from the Offenburg University of Applied Sciences, Germany were divided into three groups. All students were asked to generate ideas on cleaning lime deposits from the inside of a water pipe and were given 16 minutes to record their individual ideas. Students of two experimental groups were shown some words for two minuted each. The Su-Field group was exposed to the eight fields of MATCEMIB. The Random Word group was shown eight random words every two minutes. The Su-Field group outperformed both the Control group and the Random Word group in the number of ideas generated. It was also found that the students from the Su-Field group proposed significantly broader solutions than the students from the Control and Random Word groups. The overall results of the experiment support the conclusions made by the RMIT researchers that simple ideation techniques can significantly improve idea generation and that the systematised Substance-Field Analysis is a suitable heuristic for engineering students.