300 Sozialwissenschaften
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of a Book (64)
- Article (unreviewed) (29)
- Article (reviewed) (22)
- Book (12)
- Contribution to a Periodical (9)
- Working Paper (7)
- Conference Proceeding (6)
- Other (1)
- Report (1)
Conference Type
- Konferenzartikel (6)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (151) (remove)
Keywords
- Digitalisierung (15)
- Data Analytics (12)
- Industrie 4.0 (12)
- Social Media (12)
- Social Media Marketing (12)
- Big Data (11)
- Fraud Analytics (11)
- Smart City (11)
- Surveillance (11)
- Bildungsmanagement (8)
Institute
- Fakultät Medien und Informationswesen (M+I) (bis 21.04.2021) (75)
- Fakultät Wirtschaft (W) (38)
- Fakultät Medien (M) (ab 22.04.2021) (37)
- IfTI - Institute for Trade and Innovation (11)
- Fakultät Elektrotechnik, Medizintechnik und Informatik (EMI) (ab 04/2019) (2)
- ACI - Affective and Cognitive Institute (1)
- Zentrale Einrichtungen (1)
Open Access
- Closed Access (76)
- Open Access (37)
- Closed (22)
- Bronze (7)
- Gold (2)
- Diamond (1)
- Grün (1)
- Hybrid (1)
The three lines of defense model (TLoD) aims to provide a simple and effective way to improve coordination and enhance communications on risk management and control by clarifying the essential roles and duties of different governance functions. Without effective coordination of these governance functions, work can be duplicated or key risks may be missed or misjudged. To address these challenges, professional standards recommend that the chief audit executive (CAE) coordinates activities with other internal and external governance stakeholders (assurance providers). We consider survey responses from 415 CAEs from Austria, Germany, and Switzerland to analyze determinants that help to implement the TLoD without any challenges and to explore the extent of (coordination) challenges between the internal audit function and the respective governance stakeholders. Our results show a great variance in the extent of coordination challenges dependent on different determinants and the respective governance stakeholder.
Interne Revision: Anforderungen an die Wirksamkeit – ein Vergleich von IDW EPS 983 und MaRisk
(2017)